[ERR5RS] FFI concern from a lowly user

[David Rush]

On Feb 2, 2008 11:10 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera <l.valerimanera at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 03/02/2008, David Rush <kumoyuki at gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-0/srfi-0.html
> >  http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-7/srfi-7.html
>
> I'm sorry, should I interpret that as "gain wisdom fom teh sfri's,
> stupid nub!" or as "it shall be up to the ffi lib or/and app
> programmer to implement as many ffi interfaces as there are scheme
> implementations in order to make a portale app, stupid nub!" ? :D


Well "stupid nub" was not part of it, but one of the things that people are
forgetting now in these days of widely portable platforms is that you
*always* have system dependencies that need isolation. So those parts become
the irritating seeds in the oyster of your code that help you to learn to
produce pearls of well-structured systems :)

Shanti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.scheme-punks.org/pipermail/err5rs-scheme-punks.org/attachments/20080202/5cd0cf60/attachment-0004.htm>