[ERR5RS] Process growing pains

[Harold Ancell]

At 08:15 AM 9/14/2007, Lynn Winebarger wrote:

>I have modified one of my questions to reflect its actual intent,
>rather than its natural reading.  That makes the responses invalid,
>though we don't have any agreement on whether existing votes should be
>changed, which leaves the responses as dangling pointers.

Or rather, uncollected garbage?

I made a note in the talk page about how a revision of wording big enough to change its apparent meaning should force the old version with its votes to be moved with a note, and a new one created.

                                        - Harold